Animal Controversy Sparks Outrage in Parliament: MP Claims Daughter Left Theater in Tears
Sandeep Reddy Vanga’s latest film “Animal,” starring Ranbir Kapoor, has ignited a heated debate, with its content sparking both praise and criticism. While the film has achieved box office success, its portrayal of violence and gender dynamics has drawn concern from various quarters.
One of the most vocal critics has been Chhattisgarh MP Ranjeet Ranjan. She expressed dismay at the film’s impact on young viewers, specifically her daughter who was left in tears after watching it. Ranjan highlighted the prevalence of violence and misogynistic behavior in the film, criticizing its potential to negatively influence young audiences who might see such characters as role models.
Furthermore, Ranjan criticized the film’s use of the song “Arjan Vailly,” arguing that it misrepresents historical figures and disrespects religious beliefs. She expressed concern about the normalization of violence and the undermining of historical accuracy in the film’s portrayal of sensitive topics.
Similar concerns were echoed by lyricist and poet Swanand Kirkire, who voiced his compassion for women in the face of such portrayals. He criticized the film for creating a new archetype of a man who disrespects women and finds pride in subjugating them.
While the box office success of “Animal” cannot be ignored, the film’s ethical implications and potential impact on society deserve careful consideration. The debate surrounding the film raises important questions about the role of cinema in shaping our understanding of violence, gender roles, and historical narratives. It is crucial to engage in open and constructive dialogue to ensure responsible representation and ethical storytelling in future films.
