
The Madras High Court recently dismissed the case of a CISF Constable who was removed from service for using another CISF Constable’s ATM card without permission and withdrawing money. Justice RN Manjula, who presided over the case, emphasized the severity and seriousness of the charge, stating that no lenient approach could be taken. The court deemed the act of taking someone’s ATM card without permission and withdrawing money as nothing less than stealing, justifying the dismissal from service.
The court highlighted the unique circumstances of the CISF force, where members live in close proximity to each other. Justice RN Manjula explained that the integrity and honesty of each member are of utmost importance for a harmonious coexistence within the force. Therefore, a heavy punishment, such as dismissal, is necessary to maintain the department’s integrity and protect its reputation.
The petitioner, Uma Kant, had challenged the order of the Inspector General CISF, which confirmed his dismissal from service. He argued that he had used the ATM card of another constable only in an emergency and had done so on previous occasions with the constable’s permission. Uma Kant claimed that he used the card to obtain money for a medical emergency after receiving a call from his parents. He admitted to initially suppressing this fact out of fear but later admitted the truth.
The court acknowledged the petitioner’s admission of using the ATM card without permission and rejected the request to consider his past records. Given the gravity of the offense, the court deemed the petitioner’s records immaterial. Additionally, the court dismissed the plea for leniency based on the petitioner’s early years of service, as the seriousness of the offense outweighed other factors.
In conclusion, the court found no merits in the petitioner’s arguments and dismissed the case.