Advertisement
Latest News

Bank of India Fined Rs 50,000 for Issuing Recovery Notice to Deceased Guarantor

Connect with Us

The Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Patna, declared Bank of India’s loan recovery proceedings illegal after the bank issued a recovery notice in the name of a guarantor who had died two years earlier despite being informed of his death. The tribunal cancelled the recovery action and imposed a penalty of ₹50,000 on the bank for negligence.

A case of alleged negligence by the Bank of India has reached the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) in Patna. The tribunal found that the bank had started loan recovery proceedings by issuing a notice in the name of a person who had died two years earlier. The tribunal declared the bank’s action illegal, cancelled the recovery proceedings, and imposed a fine of ₹50,000 on the bank.

Advertisement

Loan Taken by Baba Someshwar Automobiles

The case is related to Baba Someshwar Automobiles and the Bank of India. According to reports, Shambhu Prasad Singh and Abhishek Singh took a Cash Credit (CC) loan of ₹60 lakh from the Motijheel branch of Bank of India between 2017 and 2019. In 2022, the bank classified the loan account as a Non-Performing Asset (NPA).

Recovery Notice Issued to Deceased Guarantor

After declaring the account as an NPA, the bank issued a recovery notice in September 2022 in the name of the property guarantor, Satyanarayan Singh. However, Satyanarayan Singh had passed away on October 26, 2020, nearly two years before the notice was issued.

Advertisement

His son, Shambhu Prasad Singh, had already informed the bank in writing about his father’s death. Despite receiving this information, the bank continued the recovery proceedings against the deceased guarantor.

Petition Filed Before Recovery Tribunal

In November 2022, Shambhu Prasad Singh filed a petition before the Debt Recovery Tribunal in Patna. He argued that the bank had wrongly declared the loan account as an NPA and had also made errors in calculating the outstanding loan amount.

Tribunal Declares Bank’s Action Illegal

After hearing both sides, the tribunal ruled that the bank’s recovery proceedings were illegal. It cancelled the recovery action and directed the bank to pay a fine of ₹50,000 for its negligence.

Advertisement

Advertisement
Advertisement

Pradeep Singh

Pradeep Singh is a banking and finance expert covering financial markets, banking policies, and global economic trends. With a background in financial journalism, he brings in-depth analysis and expert commentary on market movements, government policies, and corporate strategies. His articles provide valuable insights for investors, entrepreneurs, and business professionals.
Advertisement