Calcutta HC says Employer must ensure Fairness in Disciplinary Proceedings

- Advertisement -

The Calcutta High Court recently made a significant ruling regarding the obligations of an employer in disciplinary proceedings. The court emphasized the importance of fairness and reasonableness in administrative actions and stated that an employer has a duty to ensure that no prejudice is caused to its employees during disciplinary proceedings.

The bench, consisting of Justice Tapabrata Chakraborty and Justice Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, observed that fairness and reasonableness are paramount issues in administrative actions. In the context of disciplinary proceedings, the employer is obligated to act fairly and ensure that no prejudice is caused to the employee. This principle implies a duty to act fairly and protect the rights of the employee.

Background of the Case

The case in question involved a writ petition challenging an order of the tribunal that rejected the petitioner’s request to submit a written statement of defense in a disciplinary proceeding. The tribunal cited the petitioner’s failure to file the written statement of defense within a reasonable period, as required by the provisions of Regulations 861(c) of the Police Regulations of Bengal, 1943.

- Advertisement -

The court noted that upon receiving a chargesheet, the petitioner had immediately submitted a representation denying the allegations and requesting an open inquiry. However, the petitioner later discovered that the respondent had been appointed as the Enquiry Officer, who stated that only the petitioner’s preliminary written statement of defense would be considered. The Enquiry Officer did not provide any reason for not accepting the petitioner’s written statement of defense.

Court’s Decision

The Calcutta High Court expressed the opinion that the tribunal should not have refused the petitioner’s prayer to allow him to file the written statement of defense. Therefore, the court set aside the impugned order and granted the petitioner leave to file the written statement of defense to the Enquiry Officer.

In conclusion, the court disposed of the writ petition by allowing the petitioner to file the written statement of defense, thereby ensuring fairness and reasonableness in the disciplinary proceedings.

- Advertisement -

Share this article...

Comments

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

More News...

Latest

Bank Loan Recovery Team attacked with rod by customer

Bank Loan Recovery Team attacked with rod by customer

RBI may transfer around Rs.1 lakh crore dividend to government

RBI may transfer around Rs.1 lakh crore dividend to government

PM Modi praises Indian Banking Sector, Net Profit of Banks crossed Rs.3 lakh crore for first time

Prime Minister Modi Highlights Remarkable Turnaround in India's Banking Sector

PSU Banks want back the power to issue Look Out Circular against Loan Defaulters

PSU Banks want back the power to issue Look Out Circular against Loan Defaulters

Investing in Mutual Funds: The 15x15x30 Rule in Mutual Funds

Investing in Mutual Funds: The 15x15x30 Rule and the Power of Compounding

Regulatory Actions on NBFCs Raise Business Volatility, says Fitch

Regulatory Actions on NBFCs Raise Business Volatility, says Fitch

Digitalisation of Banking is creating higher risks

Global Banking Regulators Warn of Increased Risks in Banking System Due to Digitalisation and Big Tech's Entry into Finance

Bank of Maharashtra Records Highest Growth Rate among Public Sector Banks

Bank of Maharashtra Records Highest Growth Rate among Public Sector Lenders

State Bank of India Acquires Stake in CCIL IFSC Limited

State Bank of India Acquires Stake in CCIL IFSC Limited

Finance Minister says Banks should focus on Core Banking Activities

Finance Minister Emphasizes Core Banking for Commercial Banks and Discusses Various Financial Matters

Latest News