Repeated Transfer Requests affect Ego of Seniors, Court orders PNB to pay compensation

➡️ Get instant news updates on Whatsapp. Click here to join our Whatsapp Group.

In a strong judgment highlighting the rights of persons with disabilities, the Calcutta High Court has ordered Punjab National Bank (PNB) to pay ₹3 lakh to one of its officers, Anirban Pal, for the inhuman and unjust treatment he faced after being promoted. The court called the bank’s behavior “reprehensible” and criticized it for failing to follow its own policies and the law.

Who Is Anirban Pal?

Anirban Pal is a bank officer who suffered a major road accident in 2015, which left him with a 70% physical disability. At the time, he was a Scale-III officer at the bank.

In 2016, he chose not to participate in the promotion process because he feared that a promotion might result in a transfer away from his home city, Kolkata. However, when he saw that two of his disabled colleagues were promoted to Scale-IV without transfer, he decided to take a chance in 2018.

What Went Wrong?

Pal was successfully promoted to Scale-IV in 2018. But soon after, the bank transferred him to Patna. He immediately requested to stay in Kolkata, explaining that he would have no caregiver in Patna and that it would be hard for him to manage alone due to his disability. However, the bank refused to consider his condition and insisted he report to Patna.

After a short stint in Patna, Pal went on medical leave due to physical pain and discomfort. He then requested either:

In December 2018, after the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities stepped in, Pal was brought back to Kolkata — but only as a Scale-III officer, losing the promotion he had earned.

When he again asked in 2020 for his Scale-IV rank to be restored, the bank denied the request, leading him to approach the High Court.

What the Court Found

Justice Rajashekhar Mantha took serious note of the bank’s actions. The court observed:

The judge even suggested that Pal’s repeated requests may have hurt the egos of his superiors, a problem that affects many public sector banks, where senior staff sometimes ignore the rights of their juniors, especially those with disabilities.

Court Verdict

While the Court did not restore Pal’s promotion, it said the bank’s behavior deserved punishment. It ordered PNB (formerly United Bank of India) to:

The court also directed:

to take disciplinary action against the officers responsible for this mistreatment.

This ruling is a major reminder that disabled employees have rights, and no organization — public or private — can ignore the law or basic human decency. The judgment also called for better awareness and sensitivity training among bank officials so that such incidents do not happen again.

Exit mobile version